14 February 2006 @ 2:27pm. I’m not sure what’s in the air, but it does not appear to be love. Despite today being Valentine’s Day (a lovely U.S. - and more and more internationally - commercialized holiday that seems near impossible to avoid), everyone at the office seems to be in a not-so-great mood. It may be the weather. It could be that there’s a big panel on Thursday, which requires lots of preparation. It could be that everyone’s personal lives happened to be irritating them on the same day. It’s okay, though, since today in some way balances out my wonderful birthday (the 12th). I had a very nice time. Today and the 12th are perhaps like yin and yang.
My computer finally arrived and I tore through the box like a child at Christmas. I now have my little computer set up in my little cubicle and now, more formal research, here I come!
Recent news concerning religion and politics in Indonesia…
(1) Said Agil jailed in haj scandal
National News - February 08, 2006
The Jakarta Post, Jakarta
“Former religious affairs minister Said Agil Hussein Al Munawar and his official responsible for haj affairs received jail terms and fines Tuesday for embezzling Rp 652 billion (US$70.7 million) from the Haj Trust Fund over a four-year period.”
The article continues:
“The corruption case underlined the pervasive nature of graft in Indonesia, and is seen as a test of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono’s stated campaign to stamp out the rampant stealing of state funds.
The religious affairs ministry — long regarded as one of the country’s most corrupt government agencies — has a near-monopoly in the lucrative business of transporting about 200,000 pilgrims annually to Saudi Arabia for the haj, The Associated Press reported.”
***This example suggests that no domain seems to be free from corruption.
(2) When religion becomes sin
Opinion and Editorial - February 13, 2006
The Jakarta Post, Jakarta
“Imagine Bali adopting bylaws based on strict interpretations of the Hindu faith, or the Christian majority in Papua taking advantage of its special autonomy privileges to embrace Christian conservatism as a legal precept to regulate daily life.
No doubt Muslims throughout Indonesia would be up in arms.
Why then are our politicians acting so obliviously to the legal misnomers that have resulted in the unnecessary employment of shariah law by regional administrations? — a practice which blatantly contravenes the 2004 Regional Autonomy Law.
Regencies and mayoralties such as Padang, West Sumatra, Cianjur, West Java, and Bulukumba, South Sulawesi, have issued bylaws implementing sharia[h]. Conservatives in other regions are also making headway in their attempt to impose their religious views as law.
This development is, perhaps, a telling sign of the political elite’s (lack of) commitment to the Constitutional vision of pluralism and equality before the law.
…Law No. 32/2004 on Regional Autonomy clearly stipulates that religious affairs are the realm of the central government. Article 28 of the law forbids regional administrations from taking decisions that discriminate against any citizen.”
***Whether one sees religion as a central government issue or a local one, there is an underlying assumption in this and related articles that religion is fundamentally a part of the state.
And what about the following quote?
“Head of the PKS faction at the House of Representatives Mahfudz Shidiq said that religious identity was within the authority of the central government, but religion, as a set of norms, was not.
According to him, there are many spheres in which religious norms were permitted. “Education, the economy and social sector are areas which are in the hands of the local administrations,” he said.
(Political parties waver on controversial bylaws, National News - February 09, 2006, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta)
***Aren’t education, economics, and certain social sectors - and how religion interacts in these areas - also said to be under the purview of the central government? Can one really separate “religious norms” from “religious identity,” and then determine the “appropriate” boundaries of state and local-level authorities?